Capital Markets Union

The European Commission has been urged to take radical steps to boost its investment industry and channel more retail savings into capital markets to help it overcome the dual challenges of Brexit and the coronavirus recovery. In a landmark report published on Wednesday, a group of financial executives, investor representatives and former policymakers called on Brussels to make a fresh push to revive its capital markets union plan, which was designed to reduce the bloc’s reliance on bank borrowing. Europe has long nurtured ambitions to develop investment markets similar to those of the US, in which funds can grow to a larger scale, bringing down costs for investors and enabling greater retail participation. However, the capital markets project has achieved limited progress since launching in 2015. The high-level forum advising the commission said “rapid and bold measures” were needed to stop Europe falling behind as it emerges from the economic crisis sparked by Covid-19. Several of the group’s recommendations involve overhauling existing EU financial regulations, which have been roundly criticised by financial groups for their unintended consequences. It calls for controversial disclosure rules known as Priips to be reviewed as soon as possible. Priips have been criticised for wildly misleading fund performance disclosures. This will pile pressure on the commission, which has largely defended the rules despite the backlash from fund groups and consumers. The group also urges the commission to accelerate retail investor take-up of funds focused on unlisted companies and infrastructure by ensuring favourable tax treatment. Regulations governing so-called long-term investment funds came into force in 2015, but only 20 such funds have been launched in this time. “The fragmented and under-developed capital markets in the EU and inadequate equity financing will weaken and slow down the EU recovery and put the EU at a disadvantage compared to other economies with better diversified funding structures,” said the group, which includes representatives from BlackRock, Schroders and Union Investment. Thomas Wieser, chairman of the advisory group, said Europe’s future success depended on the provision of “cross-border access to simple, comparable, cost-efficient and transparent products that provide sustainable value for money”. At present, he said, European investors “too often” get poor net long term returns. Europe needs more than ever a well-functioning CMU to support its economic recovery Tanguy van de Werve, European Fund and Asset Management Association director-general The recommendations also emphasise the need to develop a stronger equity culture in Europe by creating a dashboard to measure member states’ progress on pension adequacy and by probing how inducements paid to financial advisers have a negative impact on financial advice. The European Fund and Asset Management Association, Europe’s main asset management trade body, welcomed the report. “Europe needs more than ever a well-functioning CMU to support its economic recovery and provide alternative sources of financing, putting the financial wellbeing of European citizens at its centre,” said Tanguy van de Werve, Efama director-general. Guillaume Prache, managing director of consumer group Better Finance, cautioned, however, that the report would be ineffectual without political backing. Any proposals issued by the commission would have to be approved by the European parliament and European Council. “It is too early to declare victory,” said Mr Prache. “Restoring much-needed trust among individual investors will only be possible if policymakers take this report into account and seriously engage with its ‘game changing’ proposals.”

When I moved from Brussels to Vienna two years ago, I knew I wanted to invest my pension plan money in a mix of specific government bonds and some investment funds. But my Austrian bank was unable to source them. I ended up keeping my pension funds in a savings account for much longer than I had planned and watched it steadily lose value. That is the practical consequence of the EU’s segmented small national capital market for millions of citizens: limited choice and not the best advice. This must change. Bringing about more unified EU capital markets that work for everybody is a higher priority than ever for those who want to make Europe stronger, resilient and dynamic. The need to rebuild European economies after Covid-19 has only increased the urgency of harnessing a well-functioning capital market. This comes on top of financing needs for ecological transition and securing decent retirement income for citizens. These require sums way beyond what governments can achieve from taxpayers’ money alone. Insurance companies have for years been struggling with the consequences of low interest rates, partly as a direct consequence of EU prudential rules that limit what assets they can hold. We should rebalance these requirements to favour longer-term equity investment, including in green sectors. Insurance companies would see higher returns on their portfolio and innovative firms would see large increases in their potential investor base. Demand will create supply. How can we ensure that this takes place in a large and truly single market for capital? The EU has struggled for decades to make its capital markets work as one, and to a large degree still has 27 capital markets. In order to allow investors to carry out sophisticated cross border due diligence we are proposing to set up a simple, transparent, harmonised, one-stop and free EU company data base. This should be a sea change in terms of cross-border investment, especially for the smaller national markets. Our “High-Level Forum”, composed of experts from a wide spectrum of professional and national backgrounds, has just concluded a major report for the European Commission. We are recommending an array of measures to move the EU much closer to one single market for savings, investments and raising capital for our dynamic companies so they can grow. We have avoided abstract ideas that everybody could agree on. Instead, we are putting forward very precise, clear recommendations and timetables to move Europe forward. This is not an à la carte menu to order two or three courses and go home satisfied. The 17 clusters of measures are mutually reinforcing, and dependent on each other. They target improvements in the financing of business, of market infrastructure, individual investors’ engagement and reducing obstacles to cross-border investment. A functioning capital market was vital before Covid-19 and it is even more important now as the EU economy tries to recover from this global health crisis. Europe’s innovative companies have grown over decades from small to medium, but more often than not many of its most exciting prospects had to leave the continent to find the finance, mostly equity, to fuel further growth. The bloc lacks financing options in adequate form and depth for modern economic activity: more than 80 per cent of corporate funding comes from banks. In addition, small and medium-sized enterprises are confronted with unnecessarily high costs and complex obstacles to listing. Individual EU investors shy away from equities more than in the UK or the US. Sound and prudent securitisation in the EU does not work. Other obstacles to cross-border trading abound: insolvency laws and procedures; unnecessarily complex systems for refunding withholding tax; lack of financial education; the urgent need to reform national pension systems; onerous and costly listing rules; many unintended, burdensome consequences and spillovers from previous laws; widely differing definitions and rules on who actually is a shareholder and what their rights are — and many more. We have improvement plans for all these areas. As Europe works to recover from coronavirus, it is obvious that the huge financing requirements dwarf available public resources. We need to harness the potential of a large EU capital market, so growth and employment return rapidly, for as many as possible. We believe the European Council, the European Parliament and the commission should agree up front on this package with a binding timetable for delivery. Absent this, progress will be slow, very uneven or worse, death by a thousand bureaucratic cuts. The time has come for politicians to do during the work week what they preach on Sundays. In short, act.